Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities' All-important Role

The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited sports betting.

No, they weren't personally in presence, but the world-famous celebs were conspicuously consisted of in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the controversial sites using both free casino-style games and profitable prizes, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for totally free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now discovers itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of numerous gaming corporations, not to point out suit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos act as traditional casinos, just without the oversight, customer defenses and tax laws. So not just can they prevent the high 24-percent federal gambling levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulative difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in earnings last year alone. Now the business faces accusations of illegal gaming in a New York lawsuit that claims VGW uses celebrity endorsers to 'develop a veneer of authenticity' around its item. (See VGW's declaration listed below)

'I'm not exactly sure" if you don't trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies running multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a series of celebs from sports betting lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any differences in between standard sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among lots of sweepstakes casinos found online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to play at Chumba Casino, where numerous - however not all - video games are complimentary

Drake has a deal with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he routinely touts on social networks

Learn more

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements normally focus around the social element of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the capacity for real sports betting losses.

Others tempt consumers with promises of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement flaunting Drake's vehicles, planes and mansions before pivoting to footage of the rap artist playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: 'Because I never gave up.'

The discrepancy between sports betting sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complex, but operators of the latter insist they're not included with the previous.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, the majority of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for free.

'Most social sweeps customers never ever purchase,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller sized than the normal deposit or wager size at real-money online sports betting sites.'

Social gambling establishments use consumers a chance to play casino-style games with buddies. Players have the option to purchase valueless currency typically referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, but can be used to open different functions within the games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes video gaming, enabling clients to obtain other currency understood as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.

And therein lies the potential for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the past year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker occasion

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an ad flaunting Drake's cars and trucks, aircrafts and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are banned in all however seven states, which has assisted to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not require generally require recognition. However, websites like Chumba will ask for IDs from gamers trying to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit consumers to send mail-in ask for complimentary sweeps coins, offered the players follow painfully specific instructions. What's more, players are often rewarded with sweeps coins just for signing up, consequently giving them a reason to attempt their hands at any variety of gambling establishment video games for an opportunity to win - or lose - real cash.

So why are sweepstakes sites allowed to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are prohibited in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the complimentary casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competition is simply a means of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes games are merely a form of online entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is required to play at social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever need to pay for a chance to win prizes. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is an essential difference between social sweeps and conventional online gambling websites like gambling establishments.'

Consider the way that McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, however rather they're purchasing hamburgers and fries that offer them the opportunity to win financially rewarding prizes, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the video game itself does not satisfy the definition of gaming in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring technique for promoting all kinds of daily companies in the United States, whatever from burgers to publication memberships to coffee and home improvement shops,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are routinely used by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to lots of gambling market experts, that argument doesn't cut it.

For beginners, gaming attorney Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly video game does not run forever. Rather, it has a distinct beginning and end, consequently suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote real items like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last forever and they're usually not connected to casino-style games of chance,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're simply money giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] have none of the qualities commonly related to McDonald's-style sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes gambling establishments use" casino-like" payments, typically 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the common payment percentage for a momentary marketing sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the profits made by the company [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to liken the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet coffee shops that emerged in Florida, providing customers the chance to play casino-style games for genuine prizes. A lot of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually because been shuttered over claims of illegal gambling.

DJ Khaled is among several celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments must face comparable analysis.

'These differences are not approximate,' Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. 'They have consistently been pointed out by courts and state attorney general of the United States as key elements in identifying that a sweepstakes promo was in truth a guise for unlawful sports betting.'

One of the casino market's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact brand-new legislation on the issue.

'Consumers are being deprived of protections and states are passing up significant tax and earnings opportunities as this gaming replaces that carried out through managed channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the complainants who have actually taken legal action against social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without admitting any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal costs and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most current lawsuit, which is mostly comparable to its predecessors, New york city state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'unlawful sports betting enterprise. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been called as defendants in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment.

'We normally do not discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com through email. 'However, we note that this claim has only just been filed with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we operate, and remain positive about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play video games throughout many of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, developing not only excellent video games, user experiences and home entertainment, but likewise ensuring this is done safely, responsibly and at the highest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are fairly common across the online social games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we intend to intensely safeguard any claim which might be brought versus us.'

The concerns between conventional online sports betting and sweepstakes gambling establishments might prove bothersome for some star endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with conventional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that professional athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting 'sweeps' websites while at the exact same time the leagues desire to predict a strong position versus unlawful gambling - especially when attempting to tamp down the periodic gambling scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was just 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime restriction from the NBA over allegations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

In addition to VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting presumably unlawful gambling sites

Regardless, Glaser sees as a major problem for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes endorsing sweepstakes websites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the gamers' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise overlooked to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have an obligation to describe to consumers the distinctions and similarities between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW firmly insisted there is nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have full self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our service practices more broadly,' the representative said. 'A few of our values are" our players come first" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes websites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who provide their names to shady unlawful gambling websites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at threat in addition to courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege damage,' Glaser said. 'There is likewise some danger that state regulators and state attorneys basic rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in illegal sports betting.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton